Editors Viewpoint

Media frenzy

By Sam Gazdziak

I remember a few summers ago when, over the span of a few weeks, there were a few incidents where swimmers were bitten by sharks. Suddenly, you couldn’t read a newspaper or watch the news without some kind of shark-attack-related article, and it seemed like even stepping into a kiddie pool might put you at risk of getting bitten in half by a great white.

Somehow, we all survived the Great Shark Scare, not to mention the panic that bird flu would kill us all in our sleep and that Grand Theft Auto video games would turn our kids into homicidal maniacs.

The point is that media likes to jump on topics and ride them for all they’re worth, so the exposure around the swine flu outbreak of 2009 and the hysteria that’s come with it shouldn’t be surprising. To be fair, though, when Mexico City essentially closes down and the World Health Organization goes on high alert, it’s hard not to go into news overdrive.

While the media has helped spread the “swine flu” misnomer, the media’s also done its share to correct some of the inaccuracies that have gone out about the flu. Industry associations and major players have made their case that pork products are safe to eat, and the initial fear started to dissipate among consumers. Their big mistake was trying to get media outlets to replace the name “swine flu” with “2009 H1N1 flu.” I don’t care if it’s scientifically accurate, it’s a terrible name for a virus. It’s too ungainly, it’s hard to type or say, it’s not at all broadcast friendly.

The next time hysteria starts to rear its head, be it swine flu or something else, the industry as a whole can take action. Packers and processors affected by a food scare can talk to their local newspapers, TV and radio stations. You are all experts in the industry and can help correct inaccuracies. As a member of the media, I can’t tell you how great it is to find someone who wants to talk about a given subject. Just remember to avoid using “industry speak.” Speak plainly to best state your case, and don’t be too wordy -- like it or not, we’re a soundbite society. Tell people that you served up some delicious pork chops or roast chicken to your family last night, and you did it knowing the food was completely safe. Every person you can send back to the meat case at the grocery store is a win for the industry.


Sam Gazdziak, Editor
gazdziaks@bnpmedia.com

Sam Gazdziak

Editor In Chief, Independent Processor

Editor, National Provisioner

Recent Articles by Sam Gazdziak

You must register or login in order to post comments.

Market Video

Multimedia

Videos

Photos

Podcasts

The impact of the Food Safety Modernization Act
Tom Chestnut, vice president for Supply Chain Food Safety and Quality for NSF International, discusses the impact of the Food Safety Modernization Act.
More Podcasts

National Provisioner

NP Jan 2012 Cover

2012 January

Check out the January 2012 National Provisioner
TABLE OF CONTENTS SUBSCRIBE

Independent Processor

Independent Processor Dec. 2011

2011 December

Check out the December 2011 Independent Processor
TABLE OF CONTENTS SUBSCRIBE

Provisioner Store

Poultry Meat Processing
Poultry Meat Processing, Second Edition

When the first edition of Poultry Meat Processing was published, it provided a complete presentation of the theoretical and practical aspects of poultry meat processing, exploring the complex mix of biology, chemistry, engineering, marketing, and economics involved. Upholding its reputation as the most comprehensive text available, Poultry Meat Processing, Second Edition is thoroughly expanded and updated.

More Products

Sourcebook

SourcebookA complete reference guide to supplies. Go to NP's Sourcebook now to check out the latest and greatest in the meat and poultry processing business.

STAY CONNECTED

facebooklogo twitterlogo  linkedinlogo