HACCP reassessment
Given this adulteration decision, a prudent establishment producing such products should conduct a reassessment of its HACCP plan on or before March 5 to address pSTEC and document such reassessment.
As an initial matter, there is nothing in the FSIS decision that mandates testing for the pSTECs or any other specific control measure. That said, an establishment might consider handling pSTECs the way it handles E. coli O157:H7:
Purchase specifications
A purchase specification prerequisite program can support the decision that pSTEC are not a food-safety hazard reasonably likely to occur, provided:
At present, it is not known whether there will be sufficient quantities of pSTEC-tested product available for purchase beginning March 5th. In the event that there is not, an establishment could note it will use the E. coli O157:H7 test results to verify the effectiveness of the interventions for both E. coli O157:H7 and pSTEC, at least until pSTEC tested product is available.
The pSTEC adulteration decision is upon us. An establishment needs to have its gameplan prepared so it can implement on or before March 5th.
Tom Egan, vice president, Industry Services/Membership, for PMMI, adds his thoughts on how FSMA will impact meat processers and what equipment suppliers are doing to present more sanitary design options.
The Sourcebook is an exclusive buyer’s guide and reference tool for product and supplier information in the meat, poultry and seafood marketplace.
A complete reference guide to supplies. Go to NP's Sourcebook now to check out the latest and greatest in the meat and poultry processing business.