Provisioner logo
Provisioner logo
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Provisioner logo
Provisioner logo
  • NEWS
    • Industry News
    • Supplier News
    • Case Studies
    • Recalls
    • Regulations
    • New Consumer Products
  • EXCLUSIVES
    • Newsletters
    • Source Book
    • Sponsored Insights
    • Events
    • Webinars
    • Classifieds
    • White Papers
    • Provisioner Store
    • Market Research
  • MEAT PROCESSING
    • SUSTAINABILITY
    • Processing
    • Packaging
    • Ingredients
    • Formulation
    • Food Safety
    • Special Reports
    • Commentary
  • PROFILES
    • Processor Profiles
    • Processor of the Year
    • Top 100 Processors
  • MEDIA
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
  • DIRECTORY
  • MIHOF
  • INDEPENDENT PROCESSOR
  • EMAG
    • eMagazine
    • ARCHIVE ISSUES
    • Contact
    • Advertise
  • JOIN!
RegulationsExpert Commentary

Regulations & Legislation

National Bioengineered
 Food Disclosure Standard finalized

By John Dillard
DNA Engineering
February 12, 2019

On Dec. 20, 2018, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) released a final rule to implement the National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard (the BE rule). Under the BE rule, food manufacturers, retailers and importers will be responsible for labeling foods that are deemed “bioengineered” (BE). Although the BE rule exempts many meat and poultry products from the disclosure requirements, it does not completely exempt all products inspected by USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS). Foods entering commerce after Jan. 1, 2022, must comply with the BE rule.

Congress charged AMS with promulgating the BE rule when it passed a 2016 law that mandated a federal BE disclosure scheme. The federal law preempted labeling laws that had gone into effect in Vermont and were passed or under consideration in several other states. Passing a federal law allows one uniform standard in the U.S. and avoids a potential patchwork of labeling laws.

Although many would prefer to forgo the “GMO” labeling matter altogether, the BE rule is an opportunity to reframe the labeling debate. State labeling laws were largely pushed by activists who wanted labels that would effectively serve as warnings against the use of biotech food ingredients. In contrast, the BE rule appears to account for the consumer’s desire for transparency without stifling innovation in plant and animal breeding techniques.

 

What is bioengineering

With respect to food, Congress defined bioengineering as “(A) that contains genetic material that has been modified through in vitro recombinant DNA; and (B) for which the modification could not otherwise be obtained through conventional breeding or found in nature.” Based on this definition, foods containing traits produced through transgenic breeding techniques (inserting DNA from one organism into another) is clearly BE. The definition, however, was unclear with respect to foods produced with non-transgenic breeding technology, such as gene editing. Moreover, Congress was not clear whether highly refined foods such as high fructose corn syrup, which is processed to the point that it no longer contains genetic material, would be considered BE.

In the BE Rule, AMS chose a narrow definition of bioengineering. Highly refined foods such as high fructose corn syrup, sugar produced from sugar beets and oils derived from genetically engineered soybeans and canola will not need to bear BE disclosures. Incidental additives, such as processing aids, produced through BE technology will not be required to be disclosed. Finally, plants and animals produced through new gene-editing techniques such as CRISPR will not be required to bear BE labels.

 

What is exempt?

AMS provided numerous exemptions and partial exemptions from the BE rule’s disclosure requirements. For starters, most meat and poultry products will not be required to bear BE disclosures. Specifically, meat and poultry will not be deemed BE because it is derived from animals that consumed BE foods. Moreover, multi-ingredient meat and poultry products will not need to bear BE disclosures, even if other ingredients are considered BE, so long as (1) meat or poultry is the most predominant ingredient in the food or (2) broth, stock or water is the most predominant ingredient and meat or poultry is the second-most predominant ingredient. Looking to the future, meat or poultry derived from animals that are transgenically modified would need to bear BE disclosures, but gene-edited animals will not trigger disclosure requirements.

In addition to most meat and poultry products, very small manufacturers (sales less than $2.5 million) are exempt from compliance with the BE rule. Small food manufacturers (sales greater than $2.5 million, but less than $10 million) and packages that are considered “small” or “very small” are subject to modified disclosure requirements.

 

Forms of disclosure

The BE disclosure must be displayed in a conspicuous manner. The BE disclosure may be in one of four forms: (1) a text disclosure of either “bioengineered” or “contains a bioengineered food ingredient;” (2) display of the USDA BE label; (3) electronic or digital links, such as a QR code; or (4) an option to text a number to receive information.

 

Recordkeeping requirements

Regulated entities will be required to maintain records that are “customary or reasonable” to demonstrate compliance for at least two years after the product is sold or distributed for retail sale. 

 

Enforcement

AMS has limited enforcement authority under the BE standard. Failure to comply with the BE standard is considered a “prohibited act. But AMS is not empowered to issue civil penalties or require product recalls in response to violations. Instead, the only punishment that AMS may issue under the act is public disclosure of the results of its investigation into alleged violations. NP

KEYWORDS: AMS bioengineered food

Share This Story

Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!

John Dillard is a USDA regulatory attorney with OFW Law in Washington, D.C. He focuses his practice on providing regulatory compliance advice and legal representation to clients in the food and agriculture industry.

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • Double Charburger

    Premiumization drives burger category

    Shoppers seek out premium meat offerings to fulfill...
    Meat and Poultry Industry News
    By: Sammy Bredar
  • JJS Adult Pekin duck

    Poultry Report 2025: Convenience propels poultry at retail

    Despite continued economic pressures, the poultry...
    Meat and Poultry Industry News
    By: Sammy Bredar
You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Report Abusive Comment

Manage My Account
  • eMagazine Subscriptions
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Newsletters
  • Online Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service
  • Connect with The National Provisioner

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the The National Provisioner audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of The National Provisioner or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • A smiling man carrying a grocery basket is reaching down to pick up a package of meat in a grocery store.
    Sponsored byPIC

    The Green Light: New Data Shows 12-to-1 Support for Pork from PRRS-Resistant Pigs

  • Close up of a grocery cart full of groceries, a cropped image of a couple pushing the cart and a blurred background of the vegetable aisle.
    Sponsored byPIC

    New Market Research Finds Consumers in Eight Key Pork Markets Are Likely to Purchase Pork from Gene-Edited Pigs

  • Close up of a young pig with a blurred background.
    Sponsored byPIC

    New Research Forecasts Significant Economic and Market Impacts with PRRS-Resistant Pig Adoption

Popular Stories

Spam Dog

Hormel rolls out Spam hot dog for foodservice applications

Various new Primal snack sticks on a table amongst pencils, apples, a pair of glasses, lunch bags and a water bottle.

Protein demand drives snacking occasions

Several cuts of beef, pork and chicken on a wooden board, cast iron pan and salt.

Validated thermal lethality data and a new tool for ensuring safety of RTE meats

2026 Top 100 Meat & Poultry Processors Report

Events

June 11, 2026

From Fresh to Frozen in 3 Minutes Flat: Unlocking the Secrets to Temperature Control

Join Tony Vacaro, Foods Industry Manager, and Emile Klein, Foods Market Strategy Manager at Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. , as they tackle key questions surrounding heat removal in food processing. 

January 1, 2030

Webinar Sponsorship Information

For webinar sponsorship information, visit www.bnpevents.com/webinars or email webinars@bnpmedia.com.

View All Submit An Event

Products

Food Crime: An Introduction to Deviance in the Food Industry

Food Crime: An Introduction to Deviance in the Food Industry

See More Products
From Fresh to Frozen in 3 Minutes Flat: Unlocking the Secrets to Temperature Control Webinar Sponsored by Air Products

Related Articles

  • Bioengineered DNA

    USDA releases proposal for bioengineered food labeling

    See More
  • Under the National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard, food manufacturers will be required to display some form of disclosure on products that are deemed "bioengineered" or GMOs

    Congress passes federal GMO-labeling law

    See More
  • Campylobacter

    Targeting Campylobacter

    See More

Related Directories

  • National Protein & Food Distributors Assn.

    NPFDA’s Mission is to promote the Protein and Food Distributors, Processors, and Allied industries by bringing them together and providing forums to foster long-term business relationships. NPFDA provides networking opportunities where members can exchange ideas and discuss challenges and opportunities facing the protein and food industries.
  • National Turkey Federation

    Since 1940, the National Turkey Federation (NTF) has served as the national advocate for America’s turkey industry, raising awareness for our members’ products while strengthening their ability to profitably and safely deliver wholesome, high-quality and nutritious food to consumers worldwide. Headquartered in Washington, D.C., NTF represents more than 95 percent of the turkey industry. Nearly 300 companies from every sector of the industry are affiliated with NTF, including growers, processors, hatchers, breeders, distributors, allied services and state associations.
×

Stay ahead of the curve. Unlock a dose of cutting-edge insights.

Receive our premium content directly to your inbox.

SIGN-UP TODAY
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • Newsletter
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2026. All Rights Reserved BNP Media, Inc. and BNP Media II, LLC.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing