This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies
By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn More
This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
Provisioner logo Created with Sketch.
Provisioner logo Slice 2 Created with Sketch.
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Provisioner logo Created with Sketch.
Provisioner logo Slice 2 Created with Sketch.
  • News
    • Industry News
    • Supplier News
    • New Consumer Products
  • Profiles
    • Processor Profiles
    • Processor of the Year
    • Plant of the Year
  • Processing
  • Food Safety
  • R&D
    • Ingredients
    • Formulation
  • Sustainability
  • Packaging
  • Regulations
  • More
    • Top 100 Processors
    • Videos
    • Special Reports
    • Commentary
    • Events
    • Webinars
    • Classifieds
    • White Papers
    • Provisioner Store
    • Market Research
  • Magazine
    • The National Provisioner
    • Independent Processor
    • Digital Editions
    • Contact
    • Advertise
    • Connect
    • eNewsletters
    • Source Book
  • MIHOF
Home » Regulations & Legislation: GIPSA proposal - the law of unintended consequences
Legislative

Regulations & Legislation: GIPSA proposal - the law of unintended consequences

Legislative Logo
November 1, 2010
Brett Schwemer
KEYWORDS consumers / downstream / food-safety / packers
Reprints
No Comments

The Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA) regulates the sale and purchase of livestock and poultry. Over the summer, GIPSA issued a controversial proposed rule that would dramatically change how livestock and poultry are marketed, and the change would not be for the better.

As the end of the comment period draws closer, it has become increasingly evident that packers and producers are not the only ones that have high stakes in this matter. Everyone from the farm-to-table continuum, including meat processors, retailers, restaurants and consumers, is weighing in on how the proposed rule could negatively impact them.

There are many different ways that the proposed rule could harm downstream users of livestock products. One way is that the proposed rule would make it more difficult for packers and downstream processors to produce value-added products that consumers prefer, such as “natural.”

For example, the proposed rule contains several provisions (e.g., a rule requiring packers to justify price and contract terms, a rule making it an unfair practice to offer premiums without substantiating the revenue and cost justifications) that would make it easier for producers to sue packers that offer premiums and value-added contract terms in order to procure a consistent and stable supply of livestock needed for the production of quality branded products that meet consumer demand.

Faced with the threat of litigation arising from these provisions, many packers will be forced to start paying the same price for all livestock, and value-added marketing programs such as “natural,” “grass fed” and ‘lean” will go by the wayside.

Another way the proposed rule could harm downstream customers is by raising meat prices. For example, under the proposed rule, packers and their affiliates would no longer be able sell cattle that they own to other packers. If a packer does not have the capacity or need to kill all the livestock it owns, it would be forced to sell the livestock to a middleman, who would in turn sell the livestock, at likely a marked-up price, to other packers. The added costs associated with this transaction would likely be passed on to downstream users of the product and consumers.

The proposed rules could even have an impact on food safety. For example, many packers currently utilize marketing agreements and other contract terms to ensure that their producer suppliers implement pre-harvest controls necessary for their integrated food-safety systems. These agreements typically allow packers to audit the producer’s pre-harvest practices and to immediately terminate the agreements if certain controls are not followed.

If packers must discontinue using these marketing agreements due to fear of litigation created by the proposed rule, packers will no longer have the means to ensure procured livestock meet their food-safety programs or to take immediate corrective actions if they do not.

These are just a few examples of how downstream users of livestock products could be adversely impacted by GIPSA’s proposed rule. All establishments are encouraged to read the proposed regulations carefully and consider how the proposed rule could affect your particular operations and marketing programs.

Comments on the proposed rule are due November 22, 2010.

Subscribe to The National Provisioner

Recent Articles by Brett Schwemer

Avoiding regulatory landmines in recall situations

Picture this: FSIS resurrects fight to take photos

Regulatory wild ride for meat, poultry could continue in 2018

GIPSA terminates rules potentially harmful to packers

FSIS publishes new compliance guideline for label approval

Brett-schwemer

Brett Schwemer is a principal with Olsson Frank Weeda Terman Matz, PC in Washington, D.C. His primary specialty is food safety and labeling law, representing meat and poultry companies and trade associations before USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service. Brett also specializes in regulatory, compliance, and enforcement matters before other USDA agencies, such as the Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration.

Related Articles

GIPSA releases Farmer Fair Practices Rules

GIPSA terminates rules potentially harmful to packers

Shift focus to FSIS’ proposed labeling rule

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Report Abusive Comment

Subscribe For Free!
  • Print & Digital Edition Subscriptions
  • eNewsletters
  • Online Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service
  • Connect with The National Provisioner

More Videos

Popular Stories

newsbriefs

JBS USA intends to purchase Pipestone Facility from J&B Group

Collette Kaster, CEO, American Meat Science Association

Q&A with Collette Kaster, CEO, American Meat Science Association

Andy Hanacek Pointing to Fake Meat Tabloid

From the Editor's Desk: 'OK to eat meat' not a new message!

Thanksgiving Dinner

Fact or fiction: Turkey makes you sleepy

Ben Deda, CEO, FoodMaven

FoodMaven sets out to minimize food waste in the supply chain

The National Provisioner 2019 State of the Industry Report
 
The National Provisioner 2019 Top 100 Meat and Poultry Processors

Events

January 27, 2020

Meat Industry Hall of Fame

Meat Industry Hall of FameThe Meat Industry Hall of Fame Dinner and Awards Ceremony will recognize the prestigious Class of 2019, on the evening of Jan. 27, 2020, in Atlanta, GA. This Elite Networking Event is co-located with the International Production & Processing Expo (IPPE).
January 1, 2030

Webinar Sponsorship Information

For webinar sponsorship information, visit www.bnpevents.com/webinars or email webinars@bnpmedia.com.

View All Submit An Event

Products

Advances in Meat Processing Technology

Advances in Meat Processing Technology

See More Products

The National Provisioner

The National Provisioner December 2019 Cover

December 2019

Check out the December 2019 issue of The National Provisioner, featuring our cover story on chicken processor Bell & Evans, the 2020 Economic Outlook for meat and poultry, and much more.

View More Create Account

Independent Processor

Independent Processor December 2019 Cover

December 2019

Check out the December 2019 issue of Independent Processor, featuring our cover story on the family-run Dayton Meat Products, an exciting culinary trend showcased at CAB's annual conference, and much more.

View More Create Account
  • Proteins
    • Beef
    • Pork
    • Chicken
    • Turkey
    • Burgers
    • Sausage
    • Bacon
    • Deli
    • Seafood
    • Lamb / Veal
  • More
    • Want More
    • Partners
    • Food & Beverage Brands
    • Interactive Product Spotlights
    • List Rental
    • Survey And Sample
    • Privacy Policy
  • Expert Commentary
    • Editors Viewpoint
    • Fight for Food Safety
    • Legislative
  • Advertise With Us
    • The National Provisioner
    • Independent Processor
  • Subscribe

Copyright ©2019. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing