Provisioner logo
Provisioner logo
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Provisioner logo
Provisioner logo
  • NEWS
    • Industry News
    • Supplier News
    • Case Studies
    • Recalls
    • Regulations
    • New Consumer Products
  • EXCLUSIVES
    • Newsletters
    • Source Book
    • Sponsored Insights
    • Events
    • Webinars
    • Classifieds
    • White Papers
    • Provisioner Store
    • Market Research
  • MEAT PROCESSING
    • SUSTAINABILITY
    • Processing
    • Packaging
    • Ingredients
    • Formulation
    • Food Safety
    • Special Reports
    • Commentary
  • PROFILES
    • Processor Profiles
    • Processor of the Year
    • Top 100 Processors
  • MEDIA
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
  • DIRECTORY
  • MIHOF
  • INDEPENDENT PROCESSOR
  • EMAG
    • eMagazine
    • ARCHIVE ISSUES
    • Contact
    • Advertise
  • JOIN!
Meat and Poultry ProcessingSpecial Reports

Exclusive research

Report: How to ensure worker health in breading operations

By John Lechliter, Raymond BIAGINI, PH.D, Charles Mueller, MS, Chad Dowell, MS, CIH, Elena Page, MD, MPH, Elena Page
December 5, 2014
Workers at poultry breading plants exposed to airborne breading dust are at risk of developing asthma, bronchitis and upper respiratory ailments. Breading dust contains wheat and other cereal flours which have long been linked with respiratory illnesses that include allergies and a specific type of asthma called “baker’s asthma.”

Managers and operators of plants that bread poultry or other types of food should be aware of the risks of exposure to airborne breading dust, and they should use methods known to be effective in minimizing the dust that becomes suspended in the air. Also, having periodic health checks of employees and training them to be aware of the symptoms of exposure to breading dust are important steps to preserving a healthy work environment. These measures can prevent illnesses and help reduce sick leave and employee turnover. By doing so, they allow for more efficient plant operations and reduce costs associated with employee sick leave and dust-related illnesses.

A team from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) evaluated a poultry breading plant in Georgia at the request of the local poultry worker’s union. The union had concerns that plant employees had more cases of respiratory ailments such as asthma, bronchitis and nasal symptoms than other people.

The NIOSH team looked at work processes, practices and conditions at the plant. Air samples taken at different locations and times showed the concentrations of flour dust in the air that employees breathed.

The team considered employees as “lower exposure” or “higher exposure” based on their job. Lower-exposure employees worked with product that was already cooked, on a line that did not bread chicken and in other jobs with minimal direct contact with breading dust. Higher-exposure employees handled flour and other ingredients and uncooked breaded product. Employees voluntarily gave blood samples that NIOSH tested to determine whether the employees were sensitized to flour dust, wheat, garlic, onion, soybean, corn or paprika, all of which the plant used. Sensitization is the presence of certain types of antibodies specific to a particular substance. An allergy is sensitization to a substance along with allergic symptoms when exposed to that substance.

The team asked employees about their jobs and health. Employees reported whether they had cough or symptoms of asthma or allergies. They reported whether these symptoms were better, worse or unchanged on days off work.

NIOSH found the median flour dust concentration was 8.21 milligrams per cubic meter in air samples collected from areas where higher-exposure employees worked. A median is the point at which an equal number of measurements are above and below. This was nearly eight times higher than the median air concentration from the work areas where the lower-exposure group worked.

Most samples from both lower- and higher-exposure employee groups were above 0.5 milligrams per cubic meter, the occupational exposure limit recommended by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) for flour dust. For the higher-exposure group samples, the median concentration was more than 16 times the ACGIH recommended limit. Even for the lower-exposure group samples, the median concentration was more than twice the ACGIH recommended limit. The ACGIH limit is specific to flour dust and was set to make wheat flour sensitization less likely. The company had based its occupational exposure limits on the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) permissible exposure limit for particulates not otherwise regulated. OSHA’s limit is 15 milligrams per cubic meter for total dust, and 5 milligrams per cubic meter for respirable dust. The company followed OSHA’s legally enforced limit rather than the ACGIH recommended limit. NIOSH investigators recommend that employers use the ACGIH limit.

The group with the highest exposures was more likely than the lower-exposure group to report the following work-related symptoms in the past 12 months:

•  Wheezing or whistling in the chest.

•  Sneezing or runny nose — or a blocked nose without a cold.

•  Sneezing or runny nose or blocked nose without a cold, along with itchy, watery eyes.

Employees in the higher-exposure group were more likely to be sensitized to flour dust and wheat. Employees sensitized to flour dust, wheat, corn or onion were more likely to report asthma symptoms related to work than those not sensitized.

Many employees said they often coughed at work and reported coughing regardless of whether they were sensitized to breading ingredients.

Higher dust levels led to work-related asthma symptoms, cough, and rhinoconjunctivitis (nasal congestion, runny nose, post-nasal drip, sneezing and red eyes).

Given the health conditions found at the plant and the high concentrations of breading dust in the air, NIOSH urged the employer to take these actions:

•  Use an enclosed system to transfer powdered ingredients to the dispensing hoppers. Installing equipment to remove a health risk from the workplace is known as an engineering control. This solution works much better than efforts that rely on employees to take action, such as correctly wearing personal protective equipment.

•  Use a local exhaust ventilation system, another type of engineering control, to lower flour dust levels.

•  Train employees to recognize and report respiratory symptoms.

•  Hire a physician to evaluate employees for respiratory symptoms before they begin work and regularly after that.

NIOSH urged employees to take these actions:

•  Properly wear company-provided respirators. If correctly selected and worn, the respirators should lower dust levels by a factor of 1,000. The NIOSH team saw some employees wearing respirators incorrectly, which makes them less effective. Employees should use respirators until the enclosed system and local exhaust ventilation are put in place.

•  Report health problems that might be related to work to their supervisor or the plant nurse. This allows the plant to refer employees for a medical evaluation.

•  Use slow, smooth movements when handling powdered ingredients in order to keep airborne dust to a minimum. When pouring, employees should keep the smallest possible distance between the paper bag and the dispensing hoppers. Also when pouring ingredients, employees should keep the bag at the lowest possible height. Employees should open both ends of paper bags to reduce the dust that becomes airborne when they empty the bags.

To see the full report, go to http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/hhe/reports/pdfs/2009-0131-3171.pdf.

Employees, employee representatives or employers can request an evaluation of possible health hazards at a job or workplace. To request an evaluation, go to www.cdc.gov/niosh/hhe/request.html, call (800) CDC INFO (232-4636), or e-mail HHERequestHelp@cdc.gov.

 

 

 

KEYWORDS: employee welfare employee wellness worker safety

Share This Story

Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • Double Charburger

    Premiumization drives burger category

    Shoppers seek out premium meat offerings to fulfill...
    Meat and Poultry Industry News
    By: Sammy Bredar
  • JJS Adult Pekin duck

    Poultry Report 2025: Convenience propels poultry at retail

    Despite continued economic pressures, the poultry...
    Turkey
    By: Sammy Bredar
You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Report Abusive Comment

Manage My Account
  • eMagazine Subscriptions
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Newsletters
  • Online Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service
  • Connect with The National Provisioner

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the The National Provisioner audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of The National Provisioner or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • A smiling man carrying a grocery basket is reaching down to pick up a package of meat in a grocery store.
    Sponsored byPIC

    The Green Light: New Data Shows 12-to-1 Support for Pork from PRRS-Resistant Pigs

  • Close up of a grocery cart full of groceries, a cropped image of a couple pushing the cart and a blurred background of the vegetable aisle.
    Sponsored byPIC

    New Market Research Finds Consumers in Eight Key Pork Markets Are Likely to Purchase Pork from Gene-Edited Pigs

  • Close up of a young pig with a blurred background.
    Sponsored byPIC

    New Research Forecasts Significant Economic and Market Impacts with PRRS-Resistant Pig Adoption

Popular Stories

Spam Dog

Hormel rolls out Spam hot dog for foodservice applications

Various new Primal snack sticks on a table amongst pencils, apples, a pair of glasses, lunch bags and a water bottle.

Protein demand drives snacking occasions

Several cuts of beef, pork and chicken on a wooden board, cast iron pan and salt.

Validated thermal lethality data and a new tool for ensuring safety of RTE meats

2026 Top 100 Meat & Poultry Processors Report

Events

June 11, 2026

From Fresh to Frozen in 3 Minutes Flat: Unlocking the Secrets to Temperature Control

Join Tony Vacaro, Foods Industry Manager, and Emile Klein, Foods Market Strategy Manager at Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. , as they tackle key questions surrounding heat removal in food processing. 

January 1, 2030

Webinar Sponsorship Information

For webinar sponsorship information, visit www.bnpevents.com/webinars or email webinars@bnpmedia.com.

View All Submit An Event

Products

Food Crime: An Introduction to Deviance in the Food Industry

Food Crime: An Introduction to Deviance in the Food Industry

See More Products
From Fresh to Frozen in 3 Minutes Flat: Unlocking the Secrets to Temperature Control Webinar Sponsored by Air Products

Related Articles

  • double bacon cheeseburger

    2021 Burger Report: How to keep burgers a Foodservice Favorite

    See More
  • NAMI logo 2021

    House committee report: 'Worker health and safety is first priority in meat and poultry industry'

    See More
  • turkeys

    How to sustain animal welfare in NAE operations by managing intestinal health

    See More

Related Products

See More Products
  • Handbook of Food Products Manufacturing: Health, Meat, Milk, Poultry, Seafood, and Vegetables, Volume 2

  • food-crime.jpg

    Food Crime: An Introduction to Deviance in the Food Industry

See More Products

Events

View AllSubmit An Event
  • May 7, 2026

    Stop Plant-Floor Margin Leakage: How to Quantify and Eliminate Hidden Costs

    On-Demand WorkForge Advisor and veteran food production executive Tim Cook (Marlen International, LINXIS Group, Shick Esteve, AMF Bakery Systems) will share findings from The Hidden Costs of Inconsistent Employee Development in Food Manufacturing - research that outlines ten common, measurable, and fixable cost drivers that quietly hit your P&L.
View AllSubmit An Event
×

Stay ahead of the curve. Unlock a dose of cutting-edge insights.

Receive our premium content directly to your inbox.

SIGN-UP TODAY
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • Newsletter
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2026. All Rights Reserved BNP Media, Inc. and BNP Media II, LLC.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing