This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies
By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn More
This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
Provisioner logo Created with Sketch.
Provisioner logo Slice 2 Created with Sketch.
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Provisioner logo Created with Sketch.
Provisioner logo Slice 2 Created with Sketch.
  • News
    • Industry News
    • Supplier News
    • New Consumer Products
  • Profiles
    • Processor Profiles
    • Processor of the Year
    • Plant of the Year
  • Processing
  • Food Safety
  • R&D
    • Ingredients
    • Formulation
  • Sustainability
  • Packaging
  • Regulations
  • More
    • Top 100 Processors
    • Videos
    • Special Reports
    • Commentary
    • Events
    • Webinars
    • Classifieds
    • White Papers
    • Provisioner Store
    • Market Research
  • Magazine
    • The National Provisioner
    • Independent Processor
    • Digital Editions
    • Contact
    • Advertise
    • Connect
    • eNewsletters
    • Source Book
  • MIHOF
Home » Rapid advancement in rapid testing
Food Safety
Food Safety

Rapid advancement in rapid testing

Rapid Testing
October 17, 2017
Elizabeth Fuhrman
KEYWORDS rapid testing
Reprints
No Comments

Faster PCR methods, better culture methods, more selective enrichment methods and quantitative biosensor methods all have advance the field of rapid pathogen testing recently. Speed and sensitivity are two areas researchers are targeting, says Loreen Stromberg, a postdoctoral researcher at Iowa State University in Ames and chief executive officer and co-founder of NanoSpy Inc.

Stromberg and Carmen Gomes, associate professor in the department of Mechanical Engineering at Iowa State University and co-founder of NanoSpy, specialize in development and testing of biosensors for detecting foodborne pathogens in food-processing plants. The rapid test can return results in 20 to 30 minutes, versus the 24 to 48 hours necessary for enrichment-dependent methods. 

NanoSpy focuses on developing electrochemical sensors, a technology invented by Jonathan Clausssen, assistant professor in in the department of Mechanical Engineering at Iowa State University and co-founder of NanoSpy, and his team. Those sensors are electrodes fabricated with inkjet-printed graphene that are laser-treated to increase the surface area and conductivity of the sensor. These properties allow for very sensitive detection of bacteria because of the increased surface area and intense electrical field generated on the surface of the sensor, Stromberg explains. NanoSpy can functionalize the surface for numerous targets, but specifically for foodborne pathogens, it uses aptamers to detect Salmonella in pork and Listeria in dairy and produce wash water. 

“It works very much like the glucose testing that you would have available in the pharmacy for measuring glucose,” Gomes says. “You convert the signal of your bacteria binding onto your sensor into a signal that is easy to interpret by non-technical people.” 

Work on rapid testing of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) also continues this year through the Coordinated Agricultural Program (CAP) grant from the U.S. Department of Agriculture. CAP grant researchers are developing detection methods for the several STEC pathogens, including O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, O145 and O157 in the beef industry.

In turn, the CAP grant is studying three lines of PCR rapid testing. The first method is traditional PCR, which is able to detect around a dozen molecular targets simultaneously in one reaction. For the CAP grant, the technology can detect and differentiate O157 and the other six major STEC O groups of E. coli plus four major virulence genes.

“By other methods it would be difficult to handle, but by traditional PCR methods we were able to detect all 11 genes in one reaction,” says Jianfa Bai, associate professor and director of molecular research and development in the Kansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory at Kansas State University in Manhattan, Kan.

Traditional PCR is not able to quantify the concentration of bacteria in a sample. With real-time PCR, though, researchers can only detect three or four targets per reaction, but can quantify and tell not only which bacteria are present in the sample, but also the concentration of E. coli. Currently, CAP grant researchers have developed three tests to cover the seven E. coli O groups and major virulence genes. Bai says traditional PCR could be used as a screening for bacteria, and if the test is positive, real-time PCR can quantify it if needed. 

The challenge then becomes if a virulence gene, i.e., Shiga toxin gene, is detected in a sample, one cannot confirm whether the virulence gene is carried by specific bacteria because multiple bacteria strains are present in animal samples. Digital PCR, the CAP grant’s third line of PCR study, answers this challenge. Digital PCR is to have a PCR reaction allocated into at least a few hundred little chambers, having a reaction occur within each chamber.

“Because a chamber is so small, normally it only contains a single bacteria cell,” Bai explains. “If two signals, i.e., O157 and a Shiga toxin gene, are detected from the same chamber, it will indicate that the Shiga toxin gene is carried by the O157 strain. That way it not only can detect and quantify, but confirm the virulence gene is carried by which particular E. coli strain.”

Bai is optimistic about digital PCR as the test offers next-day reporting, which is much shorter than the current weeklong STEC confirmation procedure. While the CAP grant researchers are testing these methods strictly for STEC in beef, Bai adds the methodologies can be used can be used for other Gram-negative bacteria.  NP

Subscribe to The National Provisioner

Recent Articles by Elizabeth Fuhrman

Protein dominates breakfast

Banking on better trimming, deboning

Advancing sandwich construction

2019 Bacon Report: A slow in bacon's roll?

Foreign material contaminant control

Elizabeth-christenson-200x200
Elizabeth Fuhrman is a contributing writer.

Related Articles

Advancements in rapid-testing technology

Advancements In Rapid Testing

Rapid testing for pathogens in meat and poultry production

Research continues to explore additional possibilities for rapid testing

Related Products

Advances in Meat Processing Technology

Advanced Technologies for Meat Processing

Food Safety in the Seafood Industry: A Practical Guide for ISO 22000 and FSSC 22000 Implementation

Related Events

Food Plant of the Future: Advancing Food Safety through Sanitary Design

Related Directories

Advanced Food Equipment (AFE)

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Report Abusive Comment

Subscribe For Free!
  • Print & Digital Edition Subscriptions
  • eNewsletters
  • Online Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service
  • Connect with The National Provisioner

More Videos

Popular Stories

newsbriefs

JBS USA intends to purchase Pipestone Facility from J&B Group

Collette Kaster, CEO, American Meat Science Association

Q&A with Collette Kaster, CEO, American Meat Science Association

Andy Hanacek Pointing to Fake Meat Tabloid

From the Editor's Desk: 'OK to eat meat' not a new message!

Thanksgiving Dinner

Fact or fiction: Turkey makes you sleepy

Ben Deda, CEO, FoodMaven

FoodMaven sets out to minimize food waste in the supply chain

The National Provisioner 2019 State of the Industry Report
 
The National Provisioner 2019 Top 100 Meat and Poultry Processors

Events

January 27, 2020

Meat Industry Hall of Fame

Meat Industry Hall of FameThe Meat Industry Hall of Fame Dinner and Awards Ceremony will recognize the prestigious Class of 2019, on the evening of Jan. 27, 2020, in Atlanta, GA. This Elite Networking Event is co-located with the International Production & Processing Expo (IPPE).
January 1, 2030

Webinar Sponsorship Information

For webinar sponsorship information, visit www.bnpevents.com/webinars or email webinars@bnpmedia.com.

View All Submit An Event

Products

Advances in Meat Processing Technology

Advances in Meat Processing Technology

See More Products

The National Provisioner

The National Provisioner December 2019 Cover

December 2019

Check out the December 2019 issue of The National Provisioner, featuring our cover story on chicken processor Bell & Evans, the 2020 Economic Outlook for meat and poultry, and much more.

View More Create Account

Independent Processor

Independent Processor December 2019 Cover

December 2019

Check out the December 2019 issue of Independent Processor, featuring our cover story on the family-run Dayton Meat Products, an exciting culinary trend showcased at CAB's annual conference, and much more.

View More Create Account
  • Proteins
    • Beef
    • Pork
    • Chicken
    • Turkey
    • Burgers
    • Sausage
    • Bacon
    • Deli
    • Seafood
    • Lamb / Veal
  • More
    • Want More
    • Partners
    • Food & Beverage Brands
    • Interactive Product Spotlights
    • List Rental
    • Survey And Sample
    • Privacy Policy
  • Expert Commentary
    • Editors Viewpoint
    • Fight for Food Safety
    • Legislative
  • Advertise With Us
    • The National Provisioner
    • Independent Processor
  • Subscribe

Copyright ©2019. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing